Sunday, August 8, 2010

Lisa Robinson: "Why Protestants are quick to reject Catholicism - and what can be done about it."

Over at one of my favorite blogs, Parchment & Pen, Lisa Robinson offers this illuminating analysis, which clearly resonates with me. She writes:
Lately, I have been engaged in a variety of discussions in which both Roman Catholics and Protestants have been involved and I have noticed something very interesting.  Protestants are very quick to reject what Catholics contribute, even on topics that are not related to Catholicism.  In fact, I have observed a projection on the Catholic regarding their doctrine when their doctrine had nothing to do with the discussion.  It is as if the Protestant is telling the Catholic they have nothing meaningful to contribute simply because of the doctrinal positions that they hold.
It is not lost no me why this happens since at one time, I too would be very quick to dismiss Catholics and Roman Catholicism, wholesale.  The primary reason I believe  is because Protestants have embraced a model of Christianity that leaves no room for practices ascribed by Catholicism.  In fact, I think if you were to ask the average evangelical Protestant about Catholic faith and practice, you might get these kinds of responses
  • they promote a works-based system of merit
  • they have elevated the Pope to same status of Christ and scripture
  • they engage in practices that are contradictory to scripture, such as prayer to others rather than God
These were my responses at one time that demonstrated an ignorance of Catholic doctrine and its historical development.   Taken at face value, it does seem that Catholic doctrine flies in the face of what we Protestants hold dear with respect to Soteriology and Ecclesiology.  This includes
  • Salvation is through grace alone, through faith alone, through Christ alone.
  • Jesus Christ is our advocate and prayer is conducted to God through him; we don’t believe in praying to Mary or to others
  • Jesus Christ and Scripture is the final authority for faith and practice, not the Pope.
However, I have come to realize that what appears to be contradictory practices of Roman Catholicism must be examined in context of the historical development of the Catholic church and how their doctrine is sourced in a rich tradition of early church practice.  It is only through this understanding, that I believe Protestants can be more accepting and understanding of Catholic doctrine and practice.  Absent that understanding, we will always measure the practices of Catholicism against our own and deem them unorthodox at best and heretical, at worst.
>>Continue reading 

3 comments:

Lisa Robinson said...

Hi Dr. Beckwith,

Thanks for linking to my article. I realize that you have spent a great deal of time defending Catholicism in the past 3 years, but I would be honored if you could interact with the discussion that ensued and particularly points that refute Catholicism.

Lisa Robinson

Jae said...

Since the bible can't pass and make a decision of who got it right and wrong this is a must read article regarding Interpretive Authority - Evangelical protestant Keith Mathison's book, "The Shape of Sola Scriptura."

Cut and paste the link:


http://www.calledtocommunion.com/2009/11/solo-scriptura-sola-scriptura-and-the-question-of-interpretive-authority/

Peace

Matt said...

I`m grateful that I returned to Rome, after leaving her Church, to join a protestant reformation movement, which did nothing but blaspheme the Body of Christ in his Catholic Church.

Mary Mother of God, pray for our brothers and sisters who protest that they will one day unite as one, and share in the same Eucharist.

AMEN.